← Back to All Articles
RE1 Blueprint Series · Task 11 of 16

Deal with Complaints that Have Been Submitted to the Ombud for FSPs

The Office of the FAIS Ombud has been operating since 2004, giving consumers a route to redress that doesn't require the cost of going to court. As a KI, your relationship with this office is procedural as much as it is substantive — how your FSP responds matters as much as what actually happened.

The 3 QCs, in full:
QC1 — Explain the role and authority of the Ombud for FSPs
QC2 — Discuss the FSP's obligations in respect of an Ombud investigation
QC3 — Check that processes are in place ensuring the FSP cooperates with an Ombud investigation

QC1: The Authority Behind a Determination

The Ombud investigates and determines disputes independently of both the FSP and the client — it isn't an extension of FSCA enforcement, and its focus is putting the individual complainant right, not disciplining the industry broadly. An unappealed determination carries the same legal force as a High Court civil judgment, enforceable through a writ of execution if the FSP doesn't comply voluntarily.

The compensation limit sat at R800,000 from the Ombud's inception in 2004 until the Ombud Council Rules of 2024 raised it substantially. Know the current numbers precisely:

Exam trap: The most common Ombud number trap in the whole exam is R2,500,000 offered as a distractor. The correct figure is R3,500,000.

QC2: Full Cooperation Means Producing the Record

When the Ombud investigates, the FSP must cooperate fully — including producing the actual record of advice. Where an FSP cannot produce it, the Ombud draws an adverse inference: effectively assuming the FSP cannot prove the advice given was suitable.

Real scenario: An FSP with genuinely sound advice practices can't locate the record of advice for a specific client interaction under investigation. In practice, missing documentation functions as a presumption of unsuitability — good underlying conduct doesn't help if it can't be evidenced when asked.

QC3: A Documented Process, Not a Scramble

This QC tests whether cooperation is genuinely built into the FSP's operations — a documented internal process for responding promptly and completely to Ombud requests, rather than scrambling reactively each time a request lands. This connects directly to record-keeping: an FSP with poor records cannot cooperate well, however willing it is in principle.

Quick Recap

The Numbers That Actually Get Tested

RE Mastery Hub's Task Quizzes drill the R3.5 million figure specifically, since it's the single most common Ombud distractor on the paper.

Try RE Mastery Hub Free
Stuck on something? Ask the community.
Scan to join the RE Mastery Hub WhatsApp group — real students working through this exact material, every day.
Scan to join the RE Mastery Hub WhatsApp community Or tap to join directly →
← Back to All Articles